Buying properties without a
deposit is very much real and a trick that only very few know about. Back in the day when Mortgage Express were
lending about 30% of property investors were milking them and buying no money
down sometimes even cash back!
When the credit crunch hit
the technique, known as bridge and remortgage, got closed down and most
investors gave up after that stating no money down was impossible. However no money down was still possible with
a few lenders allowing the bridge and remortgage technique to work and other
techniques such as Back to Back purchasing, assignable contracts and bridged
deposit.
The amount of investors that
used these techniques dwindled down to around 5 to 6% of investors. If we look at today there are very very few
techniques that actually work, that are legal and investors know about.
If I were to hazard a guess
how many investors are using these techniques I would guess 3 or 4%. This is because most have given up on the
idea that you can really buy a property with no money. They state that no money down is either:
Fraud
No lenders accept it
The Government would not
allow it
Or other such negative
comments.
The only way you know that
none of those above apply is full disclosure.
The solicitor who acts on the transaction discloses fully to the lender
what is going on. The key question is
always at the solicitor's mind whenever they are handling the transaction:
"If the lender were aware of
all the facts would they still lend?"
Now I do not know if you
know any solicitors but they are a cautious lot. The reason being professional indemnity
insurance has gone through the roof. If they
have too many claims on their insurance they will effectively put themselves
out of business. So guess what: solicitors will tell the lender EVERYTHING! If there is any doubt that something fishy is
going on they will give the lender the heads up so there is no chance the
lender can come back on them with a negligence claim and claim on the solcitor's
professional indemnity insurance.
So if you were ever worried
that full disclosure would not be applied think again. Solicitors want to fully disclose more than
you!
So I hope another question
is popping in your mind being this one:
"Why do banks knowingly lend
100% of the true purchase price?"
Now this question I do not
know the answer as I am not a bank! It baffles
me. I had one of my purchases go
through, I bought for £17,500 and the bank lent me £21,000. Did they know I had bought it for £17,500?
YES! Did they ever question the fact
that I was borrowing more than the purchase price? NO.
Now I am going to make a
guess about these banks. They are happy
to lend 100% of the purchase price because of 3 things:
- they like to lend
- it is small amounts compared to lending as a whole
- it is to experienced investors
like I said to you earlier
100% lending is niche lending. It is a
small part of the banks lending. They
know a few investors are doing it and they know that it is the more experienced
ones doing it as well. If they were to
truly evaluate the risk on 100% loans to experienced investors which I am sure
they do then the risk would be the same as a high credit scoring professional
with a large deposit looking to buy a home.
One thing is for sure. Big banks:
Know the risks
Take on the risks
Monitor the risks
So you just have to think
are 100% loans somehow wrong. I know the
banks do not think so regardless of what the government think. Once you accept that within the industry 100%
loans are granted in certain circumstances to certain people you understand
that there is a lot to learn about this world we call BUY TO LET!
If you want to know more get
in contact.
Posted on: 1st Oct 2009