I was
checking the voting on how many times each of the 9 members voted for a rise in
the last 12 months.There are 9 members
voting 12 times a year so that is 108 votes.
So guess
how many votes were for an increase.
7
So out of
108 votes there were 7 votes for an increase.
And where
did these votes come from? One member Andrew Sentance.He is well on his own on this one.I reckon he is trying to make a name for
himself. I know all about that!
So out of
the 9 members 8 of them consistently refused to put up rates.So is this lone guy Andrew cleverer than the
other 8 and can he see something the others can’t? If I were a betting man I
would say Andrew is wrong.
Purely on
the analysis of the numbers and assuming we do not have idiots within the MPC
then you would have to say Andrew has to be wrong.The only one I would be worried about is the
way Mervyn votes.
If Mervyn
votes for a rise then the rest of the committee will follow.I think Mervyn gets to meet with the big wigs
and they tell him how to vote.Mervyns
job is to tell the MPC how to vote and the government get their way.Call me cynical but I doubt that the Bank of
England is truly independent don’t you think?
The minutes
are released on 26th Jan and the news will be all over it like a
rash.Will the voting be the usual 8-1
or will it be 5-4? How has Mervyn voted?